Book Review: Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing by Glyn V. Morrill
نویسنده
چکیده
The title of this book, Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing, indicates that this will be a book about categorial grammar. In the preface, however, several strains of categorial grammar are discussed, including combinatory categorial grammar (Steedman 2000), pregroup grammar (Lambek 1999), and abstract categorial grammar (de Groote 2001), and it is clarified that the book investigates only the tradition of type-logical grammar, or rather, those grammars based on Lambek categorial grammar (Lambek 1958). That being said, this book contains a good introduction to type-logical grammar and its first part would make a good textbook in an advanced course on the theory of type-logical grammar. In particular, exercises are sprinkled throughout the book that will be illuminating to the uninitiated reader. The book is neatly divided into three parts that are likely to be of varying levels of interest depending on the specific audience. Part I, titled “Lambek Categorial Grammar,” gives a concise introduction to a number of aspects of Lambek categorial grammar, which is suitable for an audience interested in the basic intuitions and mechanics of that grammar. Part II, titled “Logical Categorial Grammar,” introduces a number of extensions of Lambek’s grammar, each of which are motivated by linguistic considerations. This part is likely to be of relevance to linguists who are interested in the descriptive capabilities of type-logical grammar, but little attention is paid to computational aspects in this part. Part III is a collection of remaining topics that are loosely connected by their attention to processing. This part is directed towards those interested in psycho-linguistics and its connections to type-logical grammars. Section 1 of Part I introduces the origin of type-logical grammar, which is found in the grammar of Ajdukiewicz (1935) and connected to Montague’s semantics (Montague and Thomason 1974). Section 2 introduces the syntax of Lambek categorial grammar, including the introduction of both a proof theory and a model theory. This section then discusses the cut elimination proof for the Lambek calculus, the logical system behind Lambek categorial grammar. Section 3 introduces the semantics for Lambek categorial grammar, including a discussion of the Curry–Howard isomorphism and its relevance to Lambek categorial grammar. Both Sections 2 and 3 include example sentences from English and analyses for those sentences that give the reader an insight into how typelogical grammar is applied to linguistic data. Section 4, titled “Processing,” introduces proof nets for Lambek categorial grammar as a more natural representation of typelogical syntax and semantics. Human performance on garden-path sentences is used to motivate the use of both proof nets, in particular, and type-logical grammar, more generally.
منابع مشابه
A Categorial Type Logic
In logical categorial grammar (Morrill 2011[22], Moot and Retoré 2012[10]) syntactic structures are categorial proofs and semantic structures are intuitionistic proofs, and the syntax-semantics interface comprises a homomorphism from syntactic proofs to semantic proofs. Thereby, logical categorial grammar embodies in a pure logical form the principles of compositionality, lexicalism, and parsin...
متن کاملSemantically Inactive Multiplicatives and Words as Types
The literature on categorial type logic includes proposals for semantically inactive additives, quantifiers, and modalities Morrill (1994[17]), Hepple (1990[2]), Moortgat (1997[9]), but to our knowledge there has been no proposal for semantically inactive multiplicatives. In this paper we formulate such a proposal (thus filling a gap in the typology of categorial connectives) in the context of ...
متن کاملOn Anaphora and the Binding Principles in Categorial Grammar
In type logical categorial grammar the analysis of an expression is a resource-conscious proof. Anaphora represents a particular challenge to this approach in that the antecedent resource is multiplied in the semantics. This duplication, which corresponds logically to the structural rule of contraction, may be treated lexically or syntactically. Furthermore, anaphora is subject to constraints, ...
متن کاملType logical grammar - categorial logic of signs
In this age of modern era, the use of internet must be maximized. Yeah, internet will help us very much not only for important thing but also for daily activities. Many people now, from any level can use internet. The sources of internet connection can also be enjoyed in many places. As one of the benefits is to get the on-line type logical grammar categorical logic of signs book, as the world ...
متن کاملGrammar and Logical Types
This paper represents categorial grammar as an implicational type theory in the spirit of Girard's linear logic, and illustrates linguistic applications of a range of type-constructors over and above implication. The type theoretic perspective is concerned with a correspondence between the logic of types, and computational operations over the objects inhabiting types. In linguistic applications...
متن کامل